Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rinky Hijikata vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hijikata vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Rinky Hijikata vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hijikata 1 - 0 Broom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hijikata has won 48.57% of points on their second serve, while Broom has won 50.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hijikata, in recent form, has won 50.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 54.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.47% and 31.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hijikata has saved 62.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hijikata has won 52.11% of matches played (W/L 37/ 34), with Broom winning 61.63% (W/L 53/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hijikata has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 132/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Hijikata has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.48% of matches (W/L 16/ 17), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hijikata winning 1 times and Broom being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hijikata winning 2 and Broom winning 0. The last match between Hijikata and Broom was at the M25 Calabasas, 27-03-2022, Final, Hard with Rinky Hijikata getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hijikata and Broom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hijikata winning 0 times and Broom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hijikata winning 0, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hijikata has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.15 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 232.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hijikata has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hijikata has converted 33.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 37.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
75
Rank
70
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
245
Rank
235
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
61% (183-119)
Career Total W/L
63% (214-124)
43% (16-21)
YTD W/L
62% (29-18)
$798,745
Career Prize Money
$39,970
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Rinky Hijikata vs Charles Broom For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hijikata VS Broom
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Rinky Hijikata | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (34/58) | 64% (36/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (25/34) | 67% (24/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 40% (8/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (24/56) | 34% (20/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rinky Hijikata | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (16/21) | 62% (29/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (40/51) | 59% (68/48) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (422/470) | 52% (580/535) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (9/12) | 67% (14/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 159 | 301 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 116 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:16 | 1:52:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 152.73 | 222.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1672/2860) | 64% (2242/3496) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1164/1672) | 71% (1589/2242) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (577/1188) | 51% (636/1254) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (89/266) | 37% (144/389) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1109/2943) | 40% (1528/3783) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 54% (13/11) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 57% (13/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (15/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (15/34) | 62% (29/47) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 63% (10/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 46% (6/13) | 55% (12/22) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (20/14) | 76% (29/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (20/6) | 24% (29/7) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 39% (18/7) |
Rinky Hijikata Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Rinky Hijikata
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Luca Nardi
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Rinky Hijikata
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
2
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(0) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Frances Tiafoe
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Henry Searle
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Rinky Hijikata
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Rinky Hijikata
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
26 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Rinky Hijikata
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
87 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
84 of
131)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
58 of
84)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
49 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(1) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Francisco Comesana
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
1
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
10
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lloyd Harris
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hijikata Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hijikata are available here and Broom photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Rinky Hijikata
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Charles Broom
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
